Direct answer to every goal you named
Each workflow you asked about gets its own recommendation: do it, do it differently, or do not do it — and why. Refusals appear only alongside an alternative that works.
Strategy audit · no implementation
A written audit of the stack you already pay for. Keep/cut/defer decisions with money attached, a direct answer to every workflow you named, and a 30-day plan. $497 one-time.
Start the audit intake Try the free instant audit first
Strategy and written recommendations only. We never ask for account access, credentials, or API keys. No fabricated savings — if you leave a cost blank we report it as blank.
Each workflow you asked about gets its own recommendation: do it, do it differently, or do not do it — and why. Refusals appear only alongside an alternative that works.
Every system you listed, priced at what you told us, with the renewal date and the decision. Where you left a field blank we say so instead of inventing a figure.
The single highest-cost problem you ranked gets the deep pass: options compared on fit, cost, effort, and risk, with the tradeoffs stated plainly.
No finding is delivered without something concrete to do about it, owned by a named role.
What to do in week 1, 2, 3, and 4, plus the cancel rule that stops drift.
At most three, and only ones that need data only you hold. Not homework.
| Lane | Price | What you get | What it is based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free instant audit | $0 | An in-browser keep/cut scorecard for one stack. Stays on your device, no login. | Your own inputs, scored immediately. |
| Premium keep/cut pack | $12/mo | Monthly dated keep/cut research, a decision matrix CSV, a weekly checklist, and a strategy-only written reply to a completed inventory template. | The inventory you submit, answered at template depth. |
| This written audit | $497 one-time | Required discovery, a direct answer to every workflow you named, a keep/cut/defer table priced with your own numbers, a deep pass on the one bottleneck you ranked, a Monday action per finding, and a 30-day sequence. | Completed discovery plus public vendor documentation, priced against your actual costs and renewal dates. |
The $12/mo Premium pack includes a written reply against its inventory template. This audit costs more because it requires completed discovery first, answers every workflow you named directly, prices decisions against your own costs and renewal dates, and works the single bottleneck you ranked in depth. If Premium is enough for you, use it — the free audit and the $12 pack are both honest stopping points.
A previous version of this audit was built from an intake that left the systems, vendors, costs, budget, and renewal dates blank. It could not tell the client what to cut or what anything cost, and the client found it unhelpful. So the questions below are required before a paid build starts, not optional.
| Required before we build | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Every AI tool and system you pay for, one per line | The first audit could not say what to cut because it never learned what you run. |
| Who owns each one (name or role) | An unowned tool never gets renewed, cancelled, or fixed on purpose. |
| What each costs per month, and the renewal date | Real savings need real numbers. Blanks become 'we could not quantify this'. |
| The 1-3 workflows you most want to change | Every one of your stated goals gets a direct recommendation. |
| Of those, which single one costs you the most time or money | One bottleneck gets the deep treatment. The rest get a ranked plan. |
| What you currently do about that bottleneck, and what it costs you | Replacing a known cost is defensible. Adding a tool is not. |
| Compliance, legal, or data limits we must respect | Determines what is even eligible before we recommend anything. |
| Who decides purchases, and who has to live with the choice | Recommendations that ignore the approver do not get implemented. |
If discovery is incomplete, we tell you before you pay rather than shipping a document full of gaps.
Good fit: you already pay for 3+ AI or software subscriptions, you can list them, and you suspect overlap, underuse, or a workflow that is still manual. Solo operators, consultants, agencies, clinics, and small teams.
Not a fit: you want someone to set tools up for you, or you need legal, privacy, or compliance sign-off. That is implementation and advisory work outside this scope, and we will say so rather than take the fee.
The free instant audit at /stack-audit.html scores one stack in your browser and stays on your device. It is a scorecard. This is a written audit: we read your actual inventory, costs, renewals, and the bottleneck you ranked, and return specific keep/cut decisions with money attached.
Because the alternative failed. A previous audit was built on an intake that left the systems, vendors, costs, and budget blank, so it could not say what to cut or what anything cost, and the client found it unhelpful. We now require the fields that make the answer specific. If discovery is incomplete we say so before you pay.
Say so. We will show the field as unknown rather than estimate it, and the decision becomes 'find this out first' with a specific way to find it. We do not invent savings.
No, and we will never ask. We work from what you tell us plus public vendor documentation, pricing pages, and terms.
Then that is the recommendation, and it will be specific: which subscription to keep, which to cancel, and what to measure before revisiting. Several of our best findings are cancellations. But you also get a direct answer to each goal you named — a refusal is a conclusion, not the whole deliverable.
We confirm receipt within 1 business day and confirm the audit is buildable. The written audit follows within 5 business days of that confirmation.
It takes about 15 minutes and needs the systems you pay for, their owners, their costs, and the one bottleneck you want solved first. That is what lets the audit answer with specifics instead of generalities.
Ratings are editorial product assessments, not lab benchmarks. How we score.