AIDetector.cx review

Overview

Multi-modal AI-content detection covering text, images, video and voice, with sentence-level explanations, a plagiarism checker, an SEO assistant and a humanizer. Credit-based plans; the free entry is five one-time introductory checks.

Key features

• Text detection with confidence score and sentence-level colour coding
• AI image and deepfake analysis
• Forensic video and deepfake detection
• Voice and speech analysis
• Plagiarism checker and SEO assistant
• Humanizer and rewrite modes
• Verified-authorship certificates for published work
• REST API, WordPress plugin and Chrome extension

Trial checklist

Run a real job, not a demo: pick a document you actually need to screen and take it end to end. Verify whether the sentence-level explanations and signal indicators materially change what you would rewrite, compared with a single score. Record how many credits the task consumes against Pro's 300/month before committing, and repeat the same task in one alternative detector before deciding.

Pricing

Pricing changes often — verify current plans on the official site before buying. Dated snapshots: Pricing Watch.

Use cases

• Screening drafts before publishing
• Checking submitted work for AI signals
• Deepfake and AI-image checks on media
• Plagiarism plus AI screening in one pass
• Batch content-quality checks for agencies

Pros

• Multi-modal coverage - text, image, video and voice run off one credit balance
• Sentences are colour-coded with a confidence score and signal indicators rather than a single opaque verdict
• States plainly that submitted analysis text is not used to train or fine-tune models, on any plan
• Output terms are explicit: you retain ownership of submitted content and hold a licence to results for personal or commercial use
• Named legal entity (AIDetector.cx Inc., Berkeley, California) with California governing law and a 12-month default history retention that users can delete from the dashboard

Cons

• AI-text detection is inherently probabilistic; the published benchmark (precision 0.97 / recall 0.94) is the vendor's own internal-corpus result, with no independent third-party evaluation
• The free tier is five one-time introductory checks, not a recurring free plan, so evaluation without paying is short
• Credit costs swing widely by job: standard detection is 1 credit, advanced image/deepfake analysis 4 credits per image and forensic video 6 credits per 30s, so real work drains the 300 monthly credits quickly
• The name is crowded - unrelated live AI detectors run on aidetector.com and aidetector.ai, so buyers must be given the exact .cx domain
• Our two legal-page reads name different payment providers (Privacy names Paystack, the Cookie Policy names Stripe); the checkout flow was not exercised, so which processor bills self-serve accounts is unresolved

Who AIDetector.cx is for

AIDetector.cx is aimed at teams and individuals who need screening text, images, video and voice for ai-generation signals before publication or submission. It is designed for productivity workflows where output quality, adoption effort, and operating cost all matter. Compare alternatives first if you require self-hosting, unusually deep customization, or tighter policy controls than the official plan provides.

Buying decision

Verdict

Bottom line: AIDetector.cx has an AIToolsEssentials editorial score of 4.0/5. Multi-modal coverage - text, image, video and voice run off one credit balance. The main trade-off to weigh: ai-text detection is inherently probabilistic; the published benchmark (precision 0.97 / recall 0.94) is the vendor's own internal-corpus result, with no independent third-party evaluation.

Test it against one real task from your workflow this week — that tells you more than any review.

How AIDetector.cx compares

Within productivity, AIDetector.cx goes up against Gamma, Airtable AI, Microsoft Copilot and 7 others. Its edge is multi-modal coverage - text, image, video and voice run off one credit balance. Weigh that against the cons above — especially: ai-text detection is inherently probabilistic; the published benchmark (precision 0.97 / recall 0.94) is the vendor's own internal-corpus result, with no independent third-party evaluation — then check our side-by-side comparisons for task-level results before you commit.

How we evaluated

Job fit 4 - AI-content screening is a real editorial and academic need, and multi-modal coverage means one tool covers text, image and video. Output quality 3 - detection is probabilistic and the published benchmark is the vendor's own internal-corpus result, so a score must be read as a signal rather than proof. Adoption 4 - credit pricing starts low, five free checks let a buyer try it without a card, and API/plugin/extension coverage fits real workflows. Cost 3 - credit costs vary sharply by job type and 300 monthly credits go quickly once image or video analysis is involved. The 4.0 reflects genuine breadth in a category where no tool can claim certainty.

The AIToolsEssentials rating is an editorial score—not an external benchmark. It summarizes job fit, likely output quality, ease of adoption, and operational cost using published product information, benchmark context where the exact model is identifiable, and the repeatable trial checklist above. Benchmarks never determine the final product rating by themselves. See our editorial methodology, evidence ledger, and benchmark evidence policy.

Frequently asked questions